Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Delmar Boulevard results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Pessimism Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 670 hits . Analysis detected 3,985 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (29,217 of 35,356 keywords). This Delmar Boulevard is better (less manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group. Delmar Boulevard
Keyword details
Total words: 6,140
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst