Keyword summary
39%1 analyzed article/video1,329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Delivery Workers results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 357 hits. Analysis detected 2,789 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,987 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,275 of 37,536 keywords). This Delivery Workers is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
Delivery Workers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
38%Delivery Workers (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,987
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

38% percentile
025507510038.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos