Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video619 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dei Coalition results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 644 hits. Analysis detected 2,091 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,476 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 78% (8,221 of 36,408 keywords). This Dei Coalition is worse (more manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group.
Dei Coalition
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
78%Dei Coalition (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,476
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

77% percentile
025507510077.4% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 26.0%26.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 26.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos