Keyword summary
75% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,907 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense Tech results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 1,330 hits . Analysis detected 9,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,101 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,794 of 37,536 keywords). This Defense Tech is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Defense Tech
Keyword details
Total words: 9,101
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst