Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 775 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defence Spending results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection , Overconfidence Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 250 hits . Analysis detected 1,819 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,136 of 37,536 keywords). This Defence Spending is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group. Defence Spending
Keyword details
Total words: 3,100
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst