Keyword summary
63% 1 analyzed article/video 1,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Michael results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 316 hits . Analysis detected 2,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,003 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,217 of 37,536 keywords). This David Michael is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group. David Michael
Keyword details
Total words: 3,003
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst