Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,571 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Blight results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 716 hits . Analysis detected 3,952 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,687 of 37,536 keywords). This David Blight is better (less manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group. David Blight
Keyword details
Total words: 6,284
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst