Keyword summary
77% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,362 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Beckham results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 2,578 hits . Analysis detected 14,659 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,828 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 52% (18,281 of 37,536 keywords). This David Beckham is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group. David Beckham
Keyword details
Total words: 12,828
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.3% percentile 2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst