Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Bailey results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 480 hits . Analysis detected 2,814 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,795 of 37,536 keywords). This David Bailey is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group. David Bailey
Keyword details
Total words: 5,876
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst