Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dating App Cover Up results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 261 hits . Analysis detected 1,962 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of â 71% (11,151 of 37,420 keywords). This Dating App Cover Up is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group. Dating App Cover Up
Keyword details
Total words: 1,904
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.2% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.6% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst