Keyword summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 1,874 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dare To Dream results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 1,158 hits . Analysis detected 5,333 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,622 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,710 of 37,536 keywords). This Dare To Dream is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group. Dare To Dream
Keyword details
Total words: 5,622
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 20.6% 20.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst