Keyword summary
â 89% 1 analyzed article/video 650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Tirado results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 478 hits . Analysis detected 1,832 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,950 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of â 74% (9,484 of 35,555 keywords). This Daniel Tirado is worse (more manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group. Daniel Tirado
Keyword details
Total words: 1,950
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.3% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 24.5% 24.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 24.5%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst