Keyword summary
65% 3 analyzed articles/videos 5,577 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Caesar results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 4,161 hits . Analysis detected 14,503 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,958 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,859 of 37,536 keywords). This Daniel Caesar is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group. Daniel Caesar
Keyword details
Total words: 20,958
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles21K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 19.9% 19.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst