Keyword summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video645 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Rather results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 309 hits. Analysis detected 1,811 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,935 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (14,655 of 34,833 keywords). This Dan Rather is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Dan Rather
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠58%Dan Rather (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,935
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510057.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.6%15.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 16.0%16.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos