Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,353 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Hurley results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 1,910 hits . Analysis detected 14,597 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,412 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (22,670 of 34,850 keywords). This Dan Hurley is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group. Dan Hurley
Keyword details
Total words: 13,412
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst