Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 470 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Abrams results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Out-Group Homogeneity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 246 hits . Analysis detected 1,979 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,811 of 37,536 keywords). This Dan Abrams is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group. Dan Abrams
Keyword details
Total words: 1,880
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.2% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Straw Man: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% No True Scotsman: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst