Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,291 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Damburger results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Status Quo Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 238 hits . Analysis detected 1,837 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,873 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (27,660 of 36,177 keywords). This Damburger is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Damburger
Keyword details
Total words: 3,873
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.6% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst