Keyword summary
31% 2 analyzed articles/videos 817 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dallas Public Library results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 305 hits . Analysis detected 1,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,268 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 33% (37,269 of 55,275 keywords). This Dallas Public Library is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group. Dallas Public Library
Keyword details
Total words: 3,268
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst