Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,155 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daily Mail results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 674 hits . Analysis detected 4,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,620 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (20,518 of 37,208 keywords). This Daily Mail is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group. Daily Mail
Keyword details
Total words: 4,620
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.9% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst