Keyword summary
58%1 analyzed article/video726 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cyebrsecurity results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 233 hits. Analysis detected 1,893 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 67% (19,353 of 58,404 keywords). This Cyebrsecurity is worse (more manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group.
Cyebrsecurity
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
67%Cyebrsecurity (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,904
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510066.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos