Keyword summary
66%2 analyzed articles/videos1,107 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cyclist Crash results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 667 hits. Analysis detected 5,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,357 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (21,281 of 35,444 keywords). This Cyclist Crash is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Cyclist Crash
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
40%Cyclist Crash (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,357
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510040.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos