Keyword summary
â 66% 1 analyzed article/video 1,107 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cycling Advocates results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 467 hits . Analysis detected 2,783 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,321 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of â 51% (17,668 of 35,701 keywords). This Cycling Advocates is worse (more manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group. Cycling Advocates
Keyword details
Total words: 3,321
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst