Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos578 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cybercab results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 255 hits. Analysis detected 2,297 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,040 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,385 of 37,536 keywords). This Cybercab is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group.
Cybercab
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
67%Cybercab (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,040
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510067.0% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos