Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,919 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Custody Dispute results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 665 hits. Analysis detected 3,405 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,952 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,786 of 37,536 keywords). This Custody Dispute is better (less manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Custody Dispute
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
26%Custody Dispute (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,952
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510026.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.6%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate