Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Curt Cignetti results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 33.5% saturation with 507 hits. Analysis detected 2,767 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,515 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 93% (2,787 of 37,536 keywords). This Curt Cignetti is worse (more manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group.
Curt Cignetti
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
93%Curt Cignetti (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,515
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

93% percentile
025507510092.6% percentile
8.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 33.5%33.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 15.5%15.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 19.0%19.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Keyword 33.5%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos