Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Cumberland County results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 696 hits. Analysis detected 3,431 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,232 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Cumberland County is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Cumberland County
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Cumberland County (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,232
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos