Keyword summary
99% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,421 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cultural Appropriation results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 41.9% saturation with 2,542 hits . Analysis detected 14,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,069 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 85% (5,939 of 37,536 keywords). This Cultural Appropriation is worse (more manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group. Cultural Appropriation
Keyword details
Total words: 6,069
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.2% percentile 5.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 41.9% 41.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 33.8% 33.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Keyword 41.9%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 33.8%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Keyword 28.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.2%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Straw Man: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst