Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,242 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crypto Scam results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 284 hits. Analysis detected 2,621 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (29,954 of 34,833 keywords). This Crypto Scam is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
Crypto Scam
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
14%Crypto Scam (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,968
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510014.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos