Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crowdsourcing results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 820 hits . Analysis detected 5,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,498 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,750 of 37,536 keywords). This Crowdsourcing is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Crowdsourcing
Keyword details
Total words: 4,498
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.7% percentile 3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst