Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 806 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cross Border results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 206 hits . Analysis detected 1,839 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,224 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (31,832 of 37,536 keywords). This Cross Border is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group. Cross Border
Keyword details
Total words: 3,224
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst