Keyword summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video1,230 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Croesus results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 422 hits. Analysis detected 4,583 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,690 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (12,658 of 35,047 keywords). This Croesus is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Croesus
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠64%Croesus (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,690
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

64% percentile
025507510063.9% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 10.4%10.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos