Keyword summary
60%3 analyzed articles/videos630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Criminal Investigation results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 1,042 hits. Analysis detected 7,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,480 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (19,878 of 37,536 keywords). This Criminal Investigation is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Criminal Investigation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
47%Criminal Investigation (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,480
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

47% percentile
025507510047.0% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.1%16.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate