Keyword summary
38% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,369 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Credit results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 719 hits . Analysis detected 4,758 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,899 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,162 of 37,536 keywords). This Credit is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group. Credit
Keyword details
Total words: 5,899
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst