Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 717 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Couples results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 1,129 hits . Analysis detected 5,400 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,450 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (28,441 of 37,536 keywords). This Couples is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. Couples
Keyword details
Total words: 6,450
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.5% 17.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst