Keyword summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 913 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cosmic Horror results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.9% saturation with 1,239 hits . Analysis detected 4,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,309 of 37,536 keywords). This Cosmic Horror is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group. Cosmic Horror
Keyword details
Total words: 3,652
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.2% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 33.9% 33.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 15.7% 15.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 33.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst