Keyword summary
99% 1 analyzed article/video 552 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Transparency Act results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Indoctrination , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.5% saturation with 604 hits . Analysis detected 3,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,454 of 37,536 keywords). This Corporate Transparency Act is worse (more manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group. Corporate Transparency Act
Keyword details
Total words: 1,656
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.1% percentile 6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 36.5% 36.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 16.0% 16.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 36.5%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 26.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 8.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst