Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Corporate Crime results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 2,282 hits. Analysis detected 14,413 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Corporate Crime is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Corporate Crime
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Corporate Crime (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,804
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 23.3%23.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 21.1%21.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 16.3%16.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos