Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Copay results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 1,132 hits. Analysis detected 2,782 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,393 of 37,536 keywords). This Copay is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group.
Copay
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
17%Copay (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,244
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

16% percentile
025507510016.4% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 21.6%21.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos