Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,146 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Controlled Substances Act results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 1,140 hits. Analysis detected 4,976 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,438 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 87% (4,641 of 35,718 keywords). This Controlled Substances Act is worse (more manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Controlled Substances Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
87%Controlled Substances Act (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,438
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510087.0% percentile
6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 33.2%33.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 15.9%15.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 33.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos