Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 331 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Contract Agreement results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 322 hits . Analysis detected 2,475 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,149 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (20,127 of 35,635 keywords). This Contract Agreement is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group. Contract Agreement
Keyword details
Total words: 3,149
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.5% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst