Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,880 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Continental Congress results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 708 hits. Analysis detected 5,248 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,520 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (35,771 of 37,536 keywords). This Continental Congress is better (less manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group.
Continental Congress
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠5%Continental Congress (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,520
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751004.7% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos