Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Contentid 727dc9f9 0bf9 4f05 A8c2 51376630bab0 results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 175 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,394 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Contentid 727dc9f9 0bf9 4f05 A8c2 51376630bab0 is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Contentid 727dc9f9 0bf9 4f05 A8c2 51376630bab0
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,394
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos