Keyword summary
49% 1 analyzed article/video 304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumers Energy results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 208 hits . Analysis detected 813 faulty-reasoning hits from 912 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,820 of 37,536 keywords). This Consumers Energy is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. Consumers Energy
Keyword details
Total words: 912
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.8% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles912 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 22.8% 22.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 22.8%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.6% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst