Keyword summary
17% 4 analyzed articles/videos 6,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Rights results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 1,829 hits . Analysis detected 15,232 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,374 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (34,346 of 36,868 keywords). This Consumer Rights is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group. Consumer Rights
Keyword details
Total words: 23,374
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles23.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst