Keyword summary
â 91% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consultants results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 1,288 hits . Analysis detected 10,810 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,324 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of â 72% (15,937 of 56,662 keywords). This Consultants is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group. Consultants
Keyword details
Total words: 7,324
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.9% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.6% 17.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Red Herring: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst