Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,228 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conspiracy Charges results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 5,218 hits. Analysis detected 33,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,016 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 78% (7,966 of 35,668 keywords). This Conspiracy Charges is worse (more manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Conspiracy Charges
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
78%Conspiracy Charges (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 17,016
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

78% percentile
025507510077.7% percentile
4.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles17K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 30.7%30.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 26.4%26.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 13.7%13.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 30.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 26.4%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 26.4%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate