Keyword summary
67% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,427 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Race results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,049 hits . Analysis detected 10,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,952 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (25,644 of 35,700 keywords). This Congressional Race is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group. Congressional Race
Keyword details
Total words: 10,952
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles11K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst