Keyword summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 840 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Ethics results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon , Anchoring Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 535 hits . Analysis detected 2,284 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 59% (20,455 of 49,649 keywords). This Congressional Ethics is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group. Congressional Ethics
Keyword details
Total words: 3,360
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.8% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.9% 15.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.6% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Tu Quoque: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst