Keyword summary
74%1 analyzed article/video829 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Cowards results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 984 hits. Analysis detected 4,755 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (8,090 of 37,536 keywords). This Congressional Cowards is worse (more manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Congressional Cowards
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
79%Congressional Cowards (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,316
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

78% percentile
025507510078.4% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 29.7%29.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 12.0%12.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 29.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 2.2%Tu Quoque: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos

In condemning Platner61%
Daily Kos84%By Emily Singer83%7/12/2026, 12:00:00 PM