Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video669 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Ban results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 38% saturation with 1,016 hits. Analysis detected 4,360 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,652 of 37,536 keywords). This Congressional Ban is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Congressional Ban
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
80%Congressional Ban (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,676
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

80% percentile
025507510079.6% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 38.0%38.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.2%13.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 38.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos